Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganpati zone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ganpati zone

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was going to move to Draftspace but it isn’t worth it. Both the founder and the organization fail to satisfy WP:GNG/WP:BIO & WP:ORG respectively as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliables sources independent of them. Needless to say there is 0 WP:ORGDEPTH. Celestina007 (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree it is A7 material. Mccapra (talk) 05:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as bordering on CSD A7, no assertion of notability. Google analytic links aren't sources. Vanity article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources that show the subject is notable.-- Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet GNG, looks to be COI / Promo. Lirazelf (talk) 15:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I respect all of you. I cleared 6 Google certifications which took many hours of day and night struggle ....i think it was my mistake as its of no value. As very few people clear 1 or 2 but i did 6. I will work more hard and try to come back. Regards Pankaj verma 23 (talk) 19:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.